Ask what should change when the equation is manipulated, then let the visualization test that expectation.
Foundation Lab
Constitutional AI: Principles-Based Alignment
How Claude is trained—principles replace pure human preference labeling
r_{revised} = \text{Critique}(r_{initial}, \text{principle})Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
The "constitution" is just a set of principles like "be honest" and "don't help with harm"
r_{revised} = \text{Critique}(r_{initial}, \text{principle})Use the runnable panel, the key equation, and canonical papers as separate forms of evidence for the same object.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
Use prerequisites, dependents, and semantic links to repair the next gap without leaving the object behind.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- How Claude is trained—principles replace pure human preference labeling
- Scales better than RLHF: AI can critique faster than humans can label
- More interpretable: you can see which principles guide behavior
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- The "constitution" is just a set of principles like "be honest" and "don't help with harm"
- AI feedback can bootstrap from a smaller set of human preferences
- Self-critique is iterative: multiple rounds of revision improve outputs
Interactive Visualization
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and the visualization. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Constitutional AI (CAI) uses a two-stage process:
Stage 1 - Self-Critique: Model generates response, then critiques it:
Stage 2 - RLAIF: Train reward model on AI-generated preferences:
Key insight: Principles ("Be helpful", "Don't be harmful") can guide AI feedback.