Ask what should change under a concrete input, then trace that expectation through the equation.
Foundation Lab
Constitutional AI: Principles-Based Alignment
How Claude is trained—principles replace pure human preference labeling
Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
The "constitution" is just a set of principles like "be honest" and "don't help with harm"
Use the key equation and canonical papers as the available witnesses, without implying that a runnable panel exists.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
Use prerequisites, dependents, and semantic links to repair the next gap without leaving the object behind.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- How Claude is trained—principles replace pure human preference labeling
- Scales better than RLHF: AI can critique faster than humans can label
- More interpretable: you can see which principles guide behavior
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- The "constitution" is just a set of principles like "be honest" and "don't help with harm"
- AI feedback can bootstrap from a smaller set of human preferences
- Self-critique is iterative: multiple rounds of revision improve outputs
Visualization Status
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and cited sources. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Constitutional AI (CAI) uses a two-stage process:
Stage 1 - Self-Critique: Model generates response, then critiques it:
Stage 2 - RLAIF: Train reward model on AI-generated preferences:
Key insight: Principles ("Be helpful", "Don't be harmful") can guide AI feedback.