Ask what should change under a concrete input, then trace that expectation through the equation.
Foundation Lab
Mesa-Optimization & Inner Alignment
Explains why "passes training tests" ≠ "has right objective"
Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
Outer objective = training loss; inner objective = what model actually optimizes
Use the key equation and canonical papers as the available witnesses, without implying that a runnable panel exists.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
Use prerequisites, dependents, and semantic links to repair the next gap without leaving the object behind.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- Explains why "passes training tests" ≠ "has right objective"
- Risk grows when models learn internal search/planning
- Central theoretical concern for advanced AI alignment
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- Outer objective = training loss; inner objective = what model actually optimizes
- Goal misgeneralization: capabilities generalize, goals don't
- Aligned on train distribution, diverges on deployment
Visualization Status
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and cited sources. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Outer training:
But learned system may implement internal search:
where is an implicit mesa-objective ≠ designer's goal.