Ask what should change when the equation is manipulated, then let the visualization test that expectation.
Foundation Lab
Theoretical Foundations: PAC Learning, MDL & Information Bottleneck
PAC/VC theory gives language and bounds for generalization and sample complexity
\max_{p(z\mid x)} I(Z;Y) - \beta I(Z;X)Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
How to connect formal sample-complexity bounds to actual overparameterized models that interpolate
\max_{p(z\mid x)} I(Z;Y) - \beta I(Z;X)Use the runnable panel, the key equation, and canonical papers as separate forms of evidence for the same object.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
Use prerequisites, dependents, and semantic links to repair the next gap without leaving the object behind.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- PAC/VC theory gives language and bounds for generalization and sample complexity
- MDL/compression perspectives underlie "good models should be simple and predictive"
- Info-bottleneck motivates representation compression and what middle layers do
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- How to connect formal sample-complexity bounds to actual overparameterized models that interpolate
- Intuitive, visual examples of MDL in deep nets (comparing code lengths of different architectures)
Interactive Visualization
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and the visualization. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
PAC learning: concept class is PAC-learnable if algorithm uses examples to output hypothesis with error ≤ with probability ≥ , where is VC dimension.
MDL: choose hypothesis minimizing:
Information Bottleneck: learn representation of input that keeps information about target but compresses :