Ask what should change when the equation is manipulated, then let the visualization test that expectation.
Foundation Lab
Process Reward Models
Key to o1-style reasoning: verify each step, not just the answer
R_{PRM} = \prod_k P(\text{step } k \text{ correct})Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
Outcome is sparse feedback; process is dense—better credit assignment
R_{PRM} = \prod_k P(\text{step } k \text{ correct})Use the runnable panel, the key equation, and canonical papers as separate forms of evidence for the same object.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
This atlas page keeps the working demo; the domain notebook carries the fuller Intuition -> Math -> Code -> Demo sequence.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- Key to o1-style reasoning: verify each step, not just the answer
- Better for math/code: catches errors before they compound
- Enables reliable search over reasoning paths
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- Outcome is sparse feedback; process is dense—better credit assignment
- PRMs need step-level labels—expensive but informative
- Wrong final answer could mean 1 wrong step or 10; PRM tells you which
Interactive Visualization
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and the visualization. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Outcome RM: Score final answer:
Process RM: Score each step:
Best-of-N with PRM: Reject solutions with any incorrect step: