Ask what should change when the equation is manipulated, then use the linked notebook demo to test that expectation.
Foundation Lab
Process Reward Models
Key to o1-style reasoning: verify each step, not just the answer
Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
Outcome is sparse feedback; process is dense—better credit assignment
Use the linked notebook demo, this key equation, and canonical papers as separate witnesses for the same object.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
This atlas page has no local demo; the domain notebook carries the interactive witness and the fuller Intuition -> Math -> Code -> Demo sequence.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- Key to o1-style reasoning: verify each step, not just the answer
- Better for math/code: catches errors before they compound
- Enables reliable search over reasoning paths
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- Outcome is sparse feedback; process is dense—better credit assignment
- PRMs need step-level labels—expensive but informative
- Wrong final answer could mean 1 wrong step or 10; PRM tells you which
Visualization Status
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation here and the linked notebook demo. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Outcome RM: Score final answer:
Process RM: Score each step:
Best-of-N with PRM: Reject solutions with any incorrect step: