Ask what should change under a concrete input, then trace that expectation through the equation.
Foundation Lab
Sandwiching Evaluations
Makes scalable oversight empirically testable today
Selected Foundation Object
Keep the equation fixed; move through the evidence.
Bottom = unaided human, top = expert, middle = AI-assisted human
Use the key equation and canonical papers as the available witnesses, without implying that a runnable panel exists.
The useful learning product is the reusable mechanism you can carry into another model, paper, or engineering tradeoff.
Use prerequisites, dependents, and semantic links to repair the next gap without leaving the object behind.
Why It Matters for Modern Models
- Makes scalable oversight empirically testable today
- Choose tasks where experts can judge, non-experts struggle
- Proxy for future "smart model oversight" capabilities
What Tutorials Skip
What is still poorly explained in textbooks and papers:
- Bottom = unaided human, top = expert, middle = AI-assisted human
- Tests: can weaker oversight + AI match stronger oversight?
- Foundational benchmark for alignment research progress
Visualization Status
Core Math (Optional Deep Dive)
If you want intuition first, start with the key equation and cited sources. Come back here for the full walkthrough.
Sandwich score measures AI-assisted oversight:
- : non-expert performance
- : non-expert + AI assistance
- : expert performance
Score = 1.0 means assisted non-expert matches expert.